@Article{Kane:2006:CoVaCM,
author = "Kane, Rajaram Purushottam",
affiliation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Divis{\~a}o de
Geof{\'{\i}}sica Espacial (INPE.DGE)",
title = "Comparison of the Variations of CMEs and ICMEs with those of other
Solar and Interplanetary Parameters During Solar Cycle 23",
journal = "Solar Physics",
year = "2006",
volume = "233",
number = "1",
pages = "107--115",
month = "Jan.",
abstract = "This paper examines the variations of coronal mass ejections
(CMEs) and interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) during solar cycle 23 and
compares these with those of several other indices. During cycle
23, solar and interplanetary parameters had an increase from 1996
(sunspot minimum) to \∼2000, but the interval 19982002 had
short-term fluctuations. Sunspot numbers had peaks in 1998, 1999,
2000 (largest), 2001 (second largest), and 2002. Other solar
indices had matching peaks, but the peak in 2000 was larger than
the peak in 2001 only for a few indices, and smaller or equal for
other solar indices. The solar open magnetic flux had very
different characteristics for different solar latitudes. The high
solar latitudes (45\∘90\∘) in both N and S
hemispheres had flux evolutions anti-parallel to sunspot activity.
Fluxes in low solar latitudes (0\∘45\∘) evolved
roughly parallel to sunspot activity, but the finer structures
(peaks etc. during sunspot maximum years) did not match with
sunspot peaks. Also, the low latitude fluxes had considerable NS
asymmetry. For CMEs and ICMEs, there were increases similar to
sunspots during 19962000, and during 20002002, there was good
matching of peaks. But the peaks in 2000 and 2001 for CMEs and
ICMEs had similar sizes, in contrast to the 2000 peak being
greater than the 2001 peak for sunspots. Whereas ICMEs started
decreasing from 2001 onwards, CMEs continued to remain high in
2002, probably due to extra contribution from high-latitude
prominences, which had no equivalent interplanetary ICMEs or
shocks. Cosmic ray intensity had features matching with those of
sunspots during 20002001, with the 2000 peak (on a reverse scale,
actually a cosmic ray decrease or trough) larger than the 2001
peak. However, cosmic ray decreases started with a delay and ended
with a delay with respect to sunspot activity.",
copyholder = "SID/SCD",
issn = "0038-0938 and 1573-093X",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Comparison of the variations of CMEs and ICMEs.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "14 maio 2024"
}